RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of combined intravitreal injection of dexamethasone aqueous-solution (IVD) and bevacizumab (IVB) in patients with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) and its effect on intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CSFT). METHODS: This prospective study included 10 patients (10 eyes) with DME refractory to laser photocoagulation and/or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. A complete ophthalmological examination was performed at baseline, during the first week of treatment, and monthly through week 24. Therapy consisted of monthly injections of combined IVD and IVB "pro re nata" (PRN) if CST > 300 µm. We investigated the impact of the injections on intraocular pressure (IOP), cataract development, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central sub-foveal thickness (CSFT) measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: Eight patients (80%) completed 24 weeks of follow-up. Compared to baseline, mean IOP increased significantly (p < 0.05) and anti-glaucomatous eye drops were necessary for 50% of the patients, CSFT was significantly reduced at all follow-up visits (p < 0.05), although mean BCVA showed no significant improvement. One patient developed dense cataract progression and another showed vitreoretinal traction at week 24. No inflammation or endophthalmitis was observed. CONCLUSION: Treatment of DME refractory to laser and/or anti-VEGF therapy with combined PRN IV dexamethasone aqueous solution and bevacizumab was associated with adverse effects related to the use of corticosteroids. However, there was a significant improvement in CSFT meantime best-correct visual acuity remained stable or improved in 50% of patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Conventional vitrectomy technique for macular hole surgery has a good outcome in small and medium macular holes, but for very large macular holes (minimum linear diameter higher than 700 µm) other techniques were developed aiming to achieve greater rates of closure and visual acuity gain. The purpose of this article is to report the anatomical and functional outcomes of four very large macular hole (MH) cases which have undergone vitrectomy with the pedicle internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique. METHODS: This is a retrospective series of four patients with large MH who were treated with vitrectomy and the pedicle ILM flap technique. Comprehensive ophthalmologic evaluation was performed before surgery and included ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for MH measures: height, minimum linear diameter (MLD) and external base diameter. The particular detail of this technique is related to ILM flap creation. During the peeling, the ILM was not removed completely from the retina but was left attached to the edges of the macular hole and subsequently trimmed with the vitrectomy probe using the scissors mode. RESULTS: Four patients with very large MH underwent PPV and the pedicle ILM flap technique was used to pursue macular closure. Median preoperative BCVA was 20/400 (range: 20/320 to 20/400) and median postoperative BCVA was 20/200 (range: 20/320 to 20/200). Of the 4 cases reported, 3 obtained anatomical closure (75%), and also presented BCVA improvement after surgery, considering the last follow-up visit of each case. No additional procedures were performed in either case. One patient demonstrated no anatomic and functional improvement. CONCLUSION: The present study describes the first Brazilian case series of very large MH treated by the inverted pedicle ILM flap technique. This technique was associated with anatomic and visual improvement in most cases, and represents an alternative therapeutic approach for large macular holes.Trial Registration Project registered in Plataforma Brasil with CAAE number 30163520.0.0000.5440 and approved in ethics committee from Ribeirão Preto Medical School Clinics Hospital, University of São Paulo-Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (appreciation number 3.948.426 gave the approval).
